Sunday, June 17, 2012

ELECTRICITY BILLS ARE ABOUT TO 'NECESSARILY SKYROCKET'

In January of 2008, then Senator and presidential candidate Barack Obama, talking about his energy plan, told the San Francisco Chronicle, “When I was asked earlier about the issue of coal…under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket…” He wasn’t kidding.

While he was talking about his cap and trade plan, something that went nowhere in Congress, even when Democrats controlled it with a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate, his objective of changing how we generate electricity hasn’t changed. Neither has his lack of concern for the cost to consumers.
President Obama hates coal because he has deemed it too “dirty.” It’s also the largest generator of electricity in this country. Were there a cheaper, easier (and even cleaner) source of electricity generation the market would have embraced it because that’s how markets work. But there isn’t, at least not yet.
But rather than allow the market to work, something new to be developed, the President seeks to force it, to steer it where he wants it to go. It’s something politicians have tried to do since there was a market to steer, and something they’ve failed to do successfully since their first try (Great Leap Forward anyone?).
President Obama wants to steer electricity generation away from coal to natural gas. The only problem with that is our system is set up for coal, coal is abundant and coal is easier to get. While the market may naturally gravitate to natural gas as it becomes easier to get through fracking, something the Left has demonized and is fighting, we’re not there yet.
Just like the public and humiliating failures of subsidized solar companies like Solyndra and so many others, the technology may be there but simply existing doesn’t make it practical. Neither does willing it to be.
The automobile existed for years before it took over from trains and streetcars as the dominant mode of transportation, not because it didn’t work, but because it took until Henry Ford found a way to make them affordable. The government didn’t force it, the market did.
President Obama, through the power of regulation, is seeking to force the electricity generation market in a direction it simply isn’t ready to go. And consumers will be the ones who suffer.
Coal fueled electricity generating plants can’t just flip a switch and use natural gas, changing them over is time consuming and, most importantly to consumers, very expensive. The cost of doing so will not be eaten by these electric companies, it will be passed on to consumers. And, as President Obama said, the electric bills of those consumers will “necessarily skyrocket.”
This isn’t just hyperbole. A survey of electricity executive indicates 90 percent of them expect the costs of moving away from coal power plants to lead to higher electricity bills for consumers. More than half of the survey respondents predict at least a 10 percent increase.
More than a survey, as Phil Kerpen, President of American Commitment, reports:
…PJM Interconnection, the company that operates the electric grid for 13 states held its 2015 capacity auction…The market-clearing price for new 2015 capacity – almost all natural gas – was $136 per megawatt. That’s eight times higher than the price for 2012, which was just $16 per megawatt.
But don’t expect this White House to care. They have no reason to. These price spikes are a few years away and will come long after President Obama will face voters for the last time. He’ll either be a President in his last term or a former President, neither of which carry accountability.
The accountability must come now, before it’s too late.
Congress can move against the President’s plans to regulate existing and new power coal power plants, but that is unlikely with the Senate being controlled by Democrats. It would also require him not to veto any action Congress takes, which won’t happen either. So right now, this is the future we’re facing.
Since legislative action or a regulatory change of course are unlikely, voter education is the only hope. The promise of “green energy” sounds great, but it’s just sounds at this point. We may get to the point where we can generate the electricity we need through sheer force of will or some other way the global warming true believers support, but that will have to come the way every important innovation in all areas of the economy have come – through the market finding a profitable way to meet consumer demand. But we aren’t there yet.
Until we get there, coal is still the best, most efficient and most affordable source of the electricity we need. All the regulations and wishes in the world won’t change that fact, only the market can.

Friday, March 9, 2012

We’ll mock Jesus but not Mohammed, says BBC boss

Once upon a time..... English held a stronghold for intellectuals.... no longer... and since when did 'ethnicity' provide a shield for deplorable behaviour such as murder of homosexuals, child mutilation, ignoring the poor, murder for dissidents, murder of other religions and ethnicity, genital mutilation ... and the list never ends.


The head of the BBC, Mark Thompson, has admitted that the broadcaster would never mock Mohammed like it mocks Jesus.
He justified the astonishing admission of religious bias by suggesting that mocking Mohammed might have the “emotional force” of “grotesque child pornography”.
But Jesus is fair game because, he said, Christianity has broad shoulders and fewer ties to ethnicity.

Mr Thompson says the BBC would never have broadcast Jerry Springer The Opera – a controversial musical that mocked Jesus – if its target had been Mohammed.
He made the remarks in an interview for a research project at the University of Oxford.
Mr Thompson said: “The point is that for a Muslim, a depiction, particularly a comic or demeaning depiction, of the Prophet Mohammed might have the emotional force of a piece of grotesque child pornography.”

Insults

A BBC spokesman was unavailable for comment.
Last year former BBC news anchor Peter Sissons said Christians are “fair game” for insults at the corporation, whilst Muslims must not be offended.
Mr Sissons, whose memoirs were serialised in the Daily Mail, said: “Islam must not be offended at any price, although Christians are fair game because they do nothing about it if they are offended.”
The former presenter also said that staff damage their careers if they don’t follow the BBC’s mindset.



Friday, March 2, 2012

Should we become like UK and it's national health care???

NOT what I'd want to wake up to..... but it certainly is where the current administration is leading, esp. regarding forcing those who are totally opposed to birth control and abortive medications to provide them no matter what.  (they ARE available from plenty of other sources)  And who would be the ones to decide (and yes, there are 'death panels' in the current 'health care' bill) who would live or who would get life-saving medical treatment.... treatment that might be 'expensive' and therefore to be denied or weighed as to the value of a life. 

This IS where we are headed and this is what makes THIS election so important and well might be our last one if we allow this road to continue

Killing babies no different from abortion, experts say
Parents should be allowed to have their newborn babies killed because they are “morally irrelevant” and ending their lives is no different to abortion, a group of medical ethicists linked to Oxford University has argued.

The article, published in the Journal of Medical Ethics, says newborn babies are not “actual persons” and do not have a “moral right to life”. The academics also argue that parents should be able to have their baby killed if it turns out to be disabled when it is born.
The journal’s editor, Prof Julian Savulescu, director of the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, said the article's authors had received death threats since publishing the article. He said those who made abusive and threatening posts about the study were “fanatics opposed to the very values of a liberal society”.
The article, entitled “After-birth abortion: Why should the baby live?”, was written by two of Prof Savulescu’s former associates, Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva.
They argued: “The moral status of an infant is equivalent to that of a fetus in the sense that both lack those properties that justify the attribution of a right to life to an individual.”
Rather than being “actual persons”, newborns were “potential persons”. They explained: “Both a fetus and a newborn certainly are human beings and potential persons, but neither is a ‘person’ in the sense of ‘subject of a moral right to life’.

Monday, January 23, 2012

West urged to accept rising Islamist political power in Arab world

The Associated Press has an article in the news (1/23/2012)by then NY based Human Rights Watch that the West must accept the murdering Islamists ways.  I suppose they would have endorsed Hitler's Nazi party as well.



REPORTING FROM CAIRO -- Human Rights Watch has urged the West to accept the new reality that Islamist parties are the rising political powers in Arab nations where secular autocratic regimes were toppled in last year's so-called Arab Spring movement.
In the organization's annual report, Executive Director Kenneth Roth said the West should abandon traditional repressive regimes and begin working with new Islamist politicians toward democratic reforms. In Tunisia and Egypt, where fair and transparent parliamentary elections have been held for the first time ever, Islamist parties won unprecedented majorities.
"The international community must … come to terms with political Islam when it represents a majority preference," Roth wrote. "Islamic parties are genuinely popular in much of the Arab world, in part because many Arabs have come to see political Islam as the antithesis of autocratic rule."
"Wherever Islam-inspired governments emerge, the international community should focus on encouraging, and if needed be pressuring, them to respect basic rights -- just as the Christian-labeled parties and governments of Europe are expected to do."
The report also stressed that new Islamist governments should "abide by international human rights obligations, particularly with respect to women's rights and religious freedoms."
Roth said many Western nations, in their dealings with the region, practiced what he called an "Arab exception" that included fear of political Islam and terrorism, the need to keep oil supplies flowing and a longstanding policy of relying on autocracies to maintain Arab-Israeli peace.
"It is time to end the 'Arab exception' and recognize that the people of the region deserve respect for their rights and freedoms as much as anyone else," he added.
In Tunisia, the moderate Islamic Nahda Party won more than 40% of the vote in elections in October, while the Muslim Brotherhood's Freedom and Justice Party and ultraconservative Salafis jointly won more than 70% of the the seats in Egypt's new parliament.

Monday, January 16, 2012

Barack Obama Has Declared Himself Dictator of the USA


It's Official: Barack Obama Has Declared Himself De-facto Dictator Of The United States Of America.

     While the tyrannical pronouncement went largely unreported by the Obama-media, Barack Obama declared himself de-facto dictator of the United States of America on Wednesday, possibly signaling the end of the United States as we know it.

     In what can only be described as a blatant, totalitarian and authoritarian abuse of power, Barack Obama, decreed that Richard Cordray would be the head of his so-called Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and he made his declaration without the advice and consent of the Senate, and, by doing so, he clearly violated Article 2, Section 2 of the United States Constitution.

     But do not be deceived, the Cordray decree is not just another run of the mill Obama abuse of power.

     Through this seemingly insignificant but illegal act of defiance, Barack Obama stopped sticking his toe in the water and finally took the plunge and declared Congress irrelevant, and as long as Congress accepts its newly decreed irrelevance, nothing stands in Barack Obama's way. That's how tyrannies start!

     We can't allow that to happen.  The disease that is the Obama administration must be stopped and IMPEACHMENT is the only cure

Friday, January 13, 2012

RE: 'unhappiness' in British children. Do ya' think that just MAYBE living in a socialist country, one that is being taken over by Islamists at that MIGHT have any thing to do with it.? When needs are 'met' and there is no striving for them and hence no opportunity for success, a feeling of ennui becomes pervasive? And a reason why the Scandinavian countries have the highest rates of teen alcoholism. If the State becomes the family, this is what results as the Sate is a faceless, uncaring mechanical tit from which physical 'needs' are met but the psychological/spiritual needs wither and die.


We know the early psychological  experiments of Harry Harlow which proved that monkeys chose the cuddly surrogate over the food one.  And families are increasingly less willing to touch and hug and form real attachments.  


So we wonder why the toddlers who have gone thru multiples of adult caregivers in their young formative lives lack social attachment and thus connectedness and responsibility to the social structure as a whole as they age.  One would be hesitant to say the mature or grown up as these old children never develop healthy psyches that a society needs for positive development.

Friday, January 6, 2012

BHO selling US out AGAIN

This is short but painful...  It's obvious who the current administration favors isn't it?  We are given cantaminated foods, they kill our pets, they silence different views with a bullet and then bill the family for that bullet.  Are you going to be comfortable with an x-ray machine emitting radiation on you from this company.

And what about the former workers?  They will need food stamps, unemployment for how long?  Fall into depression... need state medical care?  Will GE pay it's share?  hmmmm how much did they contribute to BHO's campaign????

If you were thinking of buying a once proud product line (we had a total GE kitchen when I was growing up) DON'T buy anything GE... and let them know why.

Keep your eye on Waukesha, Wisconsin......Their biggest employer just moved out.


General Electric is planning to move its 115-year-old X-ray division from Waukesha,Wis., to Beijing.
In addition to moving the headquarters,the company will invest $2 billion in Chinaand train more than 65 engineers and create six research centers.
This is the same GE that made $5.1 billion in the United States last year, but paid no taxes -the same company that employs more people overseas than it does in theUnited States.
So let me get this straight. President Obama appointed GE Chairman Jeff Immelt to head his commission on job creation (job czar). Immelt is supposed to help create jobs. I guess the President forgot to tell him in which country he was supposed to be creating those jobs.
Thanks Jeff, you're a "real" American....give Barrack our Best!
If this doesn't show you the total lack of leadership of this President, I don't know what does. Please pass this information to others and think about it before you buy a GE product.
For Snopes verification of this information, go to:

Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Obama-mass?


Capitol Christmas Tree Celebrates Obama not Baby Jesus?

(have we really sunk this low?)

The 63-foot Sierra White Fir lighted at the U.S. Capitol Grounds on Dec. 6 as the official 2011 Capitol Christmas Tree includes a prominently displayed ornament paying homage to President Barack Obama, but includes no ornament readily visible to a person standing near the tree’s base that uses the word “Christmas,” or includes an image of the Nativity, or bears the name or image of Jesus Christ.
On the north side of the tree–at a height of about 4 feet and easily visible to people standing near it—there is an ornament that says: “I ♥ President Obama.”


When asked whether the tree included any ornaments that mention or depict Christmas or the birth of Jesus, the office of the Architect of the Capitol, which is responsible for the tree, told CNSNews.com that it “does not have a policy nor any restrictions concerning the themes for the ornaments” that go on the tree. The office could not say, however, whether or not this year’s Christmas tree does in fact include even a single ornament that directly references or depicts Christmas or Christ.


yeah..... right....

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

She simply doesn't want to be tread upon


She simply doesn't want to be tread upon.
When 23-year-old Megan Geller was fired from her waitperson job at an Outback Steakhouse in Crystal Lake, Ill., in early October, she felt she was being discriminated against for her political leanings. Geller had been wearing a bright yellow bracelet with the words "Don't Tread On Me" inscribed on it "for months,".  
But after a couple that she was waiting on complained about the bad service they said they were receiving, Geller was let go from her job. And Geller says it was because the couple complained about the bracelet's tea party association.


The management at Outback rejected the notion that Geller was fired for any political affiliation.  "Miss Geller was not let go because of her 'tea party' bracelet" Outback's chief legal officer, Joseph Kadow, said. "On the night in question two separate tables complained about her lack of attention."


When Geller was approached about the complaints, she allegedly responded with an outburst, and Outback says that it was that behavior which prompted her dismissal. For its part, Outback reported to the Illinois Department of Employment that Geller was fired for misconduct. However, the chain is not contesting Geller's claim for unemployment benefits which would be considered normal when an employee is fired for misconduct.


 Wwhile the tea party movement has sought to embrace the image at rallies, often through attaching the emblem to the American flag, the Gadsen is in fact as inclusive an American image as they come. Having been used as a symbol of defiance throughout U.S. history, it was originated during the Revolutionary War. As the website Navy Jack, which is devoted to the flag, reports, the "Don't Tread On Me" rattlesnake was originally a symbol of resistance to British rule in America.


One wonders that if you have a DON'T TREAD ON ME flag on the back of your car, would a trouper arrest you if another motorist complained?  


Yes.  We HAVE reached that point.

Sunday, November 13, 2011

ANOTHER REASON OBAMA HAS TO GO!... AGAIN

Theoretically, smallpox has been eradicated, yet some evil scientist (such as in Iran or some other country bent on world domination) could release the germs. And is this another excuse for "Obamacare"?

Scientists are questioning a $433 million government contract for a smallpox drug they say the country doesn't need, amid concerns over the way the project was secured for a firm tied to a Democratic donor. 
The Los Angeles Times reported over the weekend that U.S. officials took unusual steps to award the contract to Siga Technologies. Democratic donor Ronald Perelman has the controlling share of the company. 

The article cited emails showing the Obama administration replaced the lead negotiator on the project following complaints from Siga -- Siga was apparently concerned about the government's objections to how much money Siga would make off the deal. 

Earlier, in December, the government also reportedly blocked other companies from bidding on the contract in a second round. 

Siga ultimately won the contract in May, but some questioned the price of the drug -- approximately $255 per dose -- and the practicality of the project. 

The government already has a smallpox vaccine on reserve. Siga's pill is meant to help people diagnosed too late for the vaccine to be effective, according to the Times. 

But the drug has not yet been approved by the Food and Drug Administration, and there are limits on how it can be tested. 

One epidemiologist described the plan as a "waste of time and a waste of money." 

But Nicole Lurie, the Department of Health and Human Services official in charge of biodefense, told the Times the contract was granted on merit. And she cited a 2004 study showing a "material threat" that smallpox could be a biological weapon. 

A Perelman representative also told the newspaper that his political donations merely represent "his right" to support candidates.

PATERNO IS CULPABLE.

Janitors in 97 and 98 SAW Jerry Sandusky showering with the boys.  The first janitor now " suffers from dementia" (convenient?)


1992 on the Friday before Spring Break, McQuery was going to drop off the shoes and pick up tapes, he sees Sandusky sodomizing a 10 year old boy.  Both saw him see them.  McQuery walked out of the locker room.  He did tell his own father and the next morning the two McQuerys went to Joe Paterno and clearly told him what he saw but Paterno said that he didn't want to hear 'the dirty details' but that he wanted to talk to the athletic dept. chair and then he said that Sandusky only 'fondled' the boy.  Yet, McQuery states that he was clear what he saw and what he told Paterno.  My question is why didn't the then 28 year old McQuery try to smack down Sandusky physically and stop him instead of abandoning the child alone with his molester in the shower?  What must that child have felt?  Did he internalize that even a higher person did not protect him, then what hope did that child have about the good in humanity?


IT WAS PATERNO WHO MINIMIZED IT AND DELAYED REPORTING WHICH IS A CLEAR VIOLATION OF LAW.  How many MORE kids were abused since that date because Paterno, Curley and the president of Penn State did NOT do their legal duties to report and follow it up?


Tim Curley, the head of athletics is being charged with lying to a grand jury.


Pen State allowed Sandusky to keep an office on campus for his 'charities' which included access to the very showers where he had anal sex with children.


As late as yesterday, the Penn State bookstore carried Sandusky's autobiography "TOUCHED".  Weird?  When he retired Sandusky took a lump payment of $140,000 and he also gets about $60,000 a year.  The president who covered this up will get $27,000 a month of the taxpayers' money.


Three years ago, Sandusky was a volunteer coach in a Harrisburg high school.   mom became alerted when a kid wanted to know why her son asked her how to find a database for 'sexual wierdos'.  She then found out that Sandusky had been taking her son out of his classes without her permission.  When the principal called the student into his office and queried him, the whole sordid thing came out.  And right before this, Sandusky had asked the mother for permission to 'punish' him.  Ever had a person ask for permission to punish your child?


The victims who are now adults will look at the Penn State, county and state officials who DID NOTHING to protect them.  Now they are getting the scope and names of the ones who allowed the abuse to continue.  How many more will now find the courage to speak out?


Will Penn State survive?  Who will want to go there?  Will students transfer out?  It's not an inexpensive school to attend.  Will they be able to afford to pay high salaries to attract good faculty?  Will good faculty 'retire' early?


The student demonstrations that took place when Paterno was fired was another example of the poor quality of education since we've had a federal department of so-called education.  What they have taught is 'feelings' not facts and how to use facts to arrive at a truth in a logical way of thinking.  They only want people to 'react' which is a way to manipulate people to support illogical agendas.



As horrible as these charges are, the story gets worse as it continues to unfold into a larger picture of apparent cover-ups, abuse of power and neglect of basic human responsibility.
This scandal has permeated the various halls and offices of that Pennsylvania institution, and now the reputations and integrity of many of those in power during these alleged molestations are being called into question.

Friday, November 4, 2011

BHO's questionable moral compass

First it was the racist Jerimiah Wright now ....

President Obama’s spiritual adviser is Rev. Jim Wallis, who also heads Sojourners, a leftist religious group that calls for wealth redistribution. Obama received so much flack with his first spiritual adviser, the outspoken Marxist Rev. Jeremiah Wright that he felt compelled to find another Marxist that wasn’t so vocal about his radical views.

When I first looked into the Sojourners a few years back, it was clear to even the most rudimentary reader that this was something of which to be wary.  While the surface objectives, peace and justice, seem non-threatening, their progressive methods are clearly socialist.  Remember that some European political parties are 'Christian Socialists', which have proven to be absolute lies.  Remember to look at what people DO, not what they say.



YOUR ACTIONS ARE SO LOUD THAT I CAN NOT HEAR WHAT YOU SAY


Sojourners: Christians for Justice and Peace


Perhaps this is why we absolutely need to avoid and established church.... to avoid this sort of thing.


They are even against providing Christmas gifts to poor children on the basis that many of the gifts given are substandard and made by unfair conditions.  They prefer to hold the exchange or giving of gifts hostage to their own agenda, sublimating the basic goodness instincts of humans.


So do the poor kids in Appalachia or the ghettos care or would they prefer to have SOMETHING under the tree?  

Wednesday, November 2, 2011

If they don't like your opinion..... they cancel you.

Who says that 'threats' don't work.  An Anti-Sharia Law conference was cancelled by the hotel when the Southern Anti-Poverty Law Center started a smear campaign.  Is this the America you want?  or is this the new AMERIKA???

the following is from FRONT PORCH POLITICS:


Hotel boots anti-sharia conference
Chad Groening - OneNewsNow - 11/1/2011 4:25:00 AMBookmark and Share
Nashville, TNA terrorism expert and Islam watchdog says a Nashville hotel has caved to Islamic supremacism.

The Tennessee Freedom Coalition describes itself as a group dedicated to keeping sharia law from being established in the United States. It had booked space for November 11 at the Hutton Hotel in Nashville to host a 300-person event called "The Constitution or Sharia: Preserving Freedom Conference" -- and event touted as the first national conference on sharia and the "Islamization of America."

But Fox News has reported that when hotel officials learned that sharia critics Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer were scheduled to speak, they promptly canceled the event and returned the deposit, citing security concerns.

Spencer says there is no excuse for the hotel's decision.

Robert Spencer"The hotel manager in Nashville is actually contradicting himself because he is invoking smear reports on us by the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Anti-Defamation League -- and then claiming that he doesn't have any problem with what we say, [that] it's just about the threats," he describes.

"But in any case, even if it is just about the threats, instead of standing up and not letting terrorism succeed, they are encouraging more of it by giving in," Spencer concludes.

As a result of the Hutton Hotel's action, organizers have moved the event to Cornerstone Church in Nashville.

"We are not going to allow ourselves to become marginalized," Spencer tells OneNewsNow. "We represent the point of view of the majority of Americans regarding Islam and jihad. We are going to not allow the Islamic supremacists to run us out of the public square."

Other schedules speakers include Frank Gaffney of the Center for Security Policy, David French of the American Center for Law & Justice, and Andrea Lafferty of Traditional Values Coalition.

The Hutton Hotel is owned by Amerimar Enterprises.

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.aspx?id=1469256

The Amerimar Entertises owns the following... the list is to suggest you do not patronize their properties if you can avoid them and that you let them know why. They own the hotels, apartments,  office buildings and multi-use facilities.Amerimar Enterprises
http://www.amerimar.com/properties.php?status=current

Friday, October 28, 2011

1percenter Michael More makes 'more'...


Michael Moore, made a reputation and career of producing very one-sided documentaries designed to promote his own perverse and warped views, is supportive of the Occupy Wall Street movement.
He actively talks about the 99 percenters and their justifiable complaints aimed at the 1 percenters in the nation. Moore has said that the wealthiest one percent are largely responsible for many of the nation’s current economic and jobs problems and they need to be held accountable. He constantly lashes out at capitalism and America’s way of allowing people like him to make millions of dollars while at the same taking advantage of the very system he attacks.
Michael Moore appeared on CNN’s Piers Morgan Tonight show recently and was questioned about his own income placing him in the top one percent. Moore denied that he’s in the top one percent and admit to his taking advantage of the system

And if anyone is interested, according to IRS reports, those people in the US considered to be in the top one percent of wage earnings make a minimum of $343,927 in annual adjusted gross income. Moore’s exact income has not been listed, but it’s easy to figure out that he does make significantly more than that a year from his projects.  He doesn’t do the his films, books and appearances for free, does he?

Moore admits to making a lot more but claims to use it for making his movies and helping  those who have lower incomes…. How much lower is never resolved.  If you make $100 less, in his eyes that would qualify as lower income.  I don’t think he means those of us who hover around $1000 or less a month. Other than produce lies and intellectual nonsense for the screen, how does Moore help those less fortunate than he? Does he give money away? Does he spend time with charitable organizations? Does he help small businesses  Has he been seen working on a Habitat house? What DOES he DO to help the ‘less fortunate’?  (He still charges them to see his lies and distorted mockumentaries.)
Michael Moore is even MUCH more guilty than many of the Wall Street elite he and the OWS are protesting. He not only is part of the one percent, but he takes FULL advantage of that position while at the same time publicly railing against the system that is making him wealthier day by day. 
Michael Moore is nothing more than a fraud, liar and charlatan and should be exposed for such.

Thursday, September 15, 2011

FRIENDS SAID I WAS WAY OFF CALLING HIM A NARCISSIST

FRIENDS SAID I WAS WAY OFF CALLING HIM A NARCISSIST  - YOU JUDGE.

Obama: "If you love me, pass this bill!" - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=OoJK7PymvtA

Obama STILL doesn't get it.  It really is NOT about him.... but apparently he hasn't gotten the message.

You could extend that 'logic' to ....IF YOU LOVE ME....
     you'll give me all your money
     you'll go turn tricks so I can have a new pimp-mobile
     you'll sell your children into slavery so I can reward my friends at Solydnra, GE, GM, Goldman-Sachs
     you'll allow me to reduce your parents Social Security and Medicare so I can reward the illegal aliens
     you'll allow me to censor the internet so any one who thinks differently from met will be shut out
     you'll allow me to tax companies and drive more of them off-shore and lose more American jobs
     you'll allow me to destroy the Constitution and institute a Socialist 'workers paradise'
     you'll allow me to tell you what to think, eat, drink, where to work, where to live

Hitler wanted the same thing.

Monday, September 12, 2011

"BUG" a Lib

Quote from the collected wisdom of Al "Non Sequitur" Gore:
"I am not part of the problem. I am a Democrat."

Saturday, September 10, 2011

The cartoons in foreign newspapers are getting tougher!

The cartoons in foreign newspapers
are getting tougher!

Funny that foreign newspapers will print what our state controlled
media will not!!
You know things are bad when even the foreign cartoonists
make fun of our 'fearless leader'! 

cid:C2912DCCE73D457EA7A7E3C3B7225F7E@WiltonDuncanPC

cid:257DC130A2D84CE380D1A9F29EFD79A1@WiltonDuncanPC
cid:9C477FAA0DD746C1AE4D9C53BFBBB496@WiltonDuncanPC
cid:FE30D0CDCFF94CEAB352486477D8FAC4@WiltonDuncanPC
cid:834E1DCDDBD243A880BCF6049FB75800@WiltonDuncanPC
cid:F157697A254D4A4D87A7405649CC2B92@WiltonDuncanPC
cid:101A8B4ECCCF40B1865A01EEB88FA80A@WiltonDuncanPC

cid:0540BCCA514641DB945491AE7C5E2F80@WiltonDuncanPC
cid:822B2CEDB51C454B8BFFE4C6629C9A83@WiltonDuncanPC
cid:90FFF08F14934F7F9D70B0BC3B9D1D2C@WiltonDuncanPC
If you don't want to share this for fear
of offending someone -- 
YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM!    
It is Time for America to Speak up!

Monday, September 5, 2011

12 Reasons Why 'They' Voted Democratic


When your friends cannot explain why they voted Democrat, give them this list.  They can then pick their reasons from this "TOP 12"...
1. I voted Democrat because I believe oil companies' profits of 4%on a  gallon of gas are obscene, but the government taxing the same gallon of  gas at 15% isn't. 
2. I voted Democrat because I believe the government will do a better job of  spending the money I earn than I would.
3. I voted Democrat because Freedom of Speech is fine as long as nobody is offended by it.  
4. I voted Democrat because I'm way too irresponsible to own a gun, and I know that my local police are all I need to protect me from murderers and thieves.
5. I voted Democrat because I believe that people who can't tell us if it  will rain on Friday can tell us that the polar ice caps will melt away in ten years if I don't start driving a Prius.
6. I voted Democrat because I'm not concerned about millions of babies being aborted so long as we keep all death row inmates alive.
7. I voted Democrat because I think illegal aliens have a right to free health care, education, and Social Security benefits.
8. I voted Democrat because I believe that business should not be allowed to make profits for themselves. They need to break even and give the rest away to the government for redistribution as the Democrats see fit.
 9. I voted Democrat because I believe liberal judges need to rewrite the Constitution every few days to suit some fringe kooks who would never get their agendas past the voters.
10. I voted Democrat because I think that it's better to pay billions to people who hate us for their oil, but not drill our own because it might upset some endangered beetle or gopher.
11. I voted Democrat because while we live in the greatest, most wonderful country in the world, I was promised "HOPE AND CHANGE".
12. I voted Democrat because my head is so firmly planted up my butt, it's unlikely that I'll ever have another point of view.